PCM.daily banner
11-12-2025 16:31
PCM.daily
Users Online
· Guests Online: 57

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 54,920
· Newest Member: RodrigueGauthier
View Thread
PCM.daily » Pro Cycling Manager 2006-2020 » Pro Cycling Manager 2014
 Print Thread
Omloop Het Niewsblad Database
MARSUPILAMI
Here is my next project with PCM 14 Modding (DBs).

As I have already done (with success) with Le Tour de France 2014 (link in my signature), I´m going to prepare a "little" DB about Omloop Het Niewsblad 2015.

I´m going to add only teams and cyclists of this year´s Omloop and I adjust stats of what we seen there.

For example, the stats could be like these (PREVIEW):

Spoiler
Stannard 83 COB, 83 FL
Terpstra 80 COB, 81 FL
Boonen 81 COB, 81 FL, 83 FIG
Vandenbergh 79 COB, 83 FL, 67 FIG

Vanmarcke 77 COB, 83 FL
Van Avermaet 76 COB, 79 FL
Stybar 76 COB, 76 FL, 65 FIG

Gilbert 74 COB, 74 FL, 76 FIG

Rowe 72 COB, 77 FL, 82 SP
Démare 72 COB, 80 SP
Kristoff 72 COB, 80 SP
Debusschere 71 COB, 78 SP

Wiggins 71 COB, 80 FL


Startlist: https://www.procyclingstats.com/race/O...-startlist
Classification: https://www.procyclingstats.com/race/O...015-result

I´ll try to get the most reality as possible, that´s why there is an important jump from Terpstra to Vanmarcke
Edited by MARSUPILAMI on 02-03-2015 14:40
imgur.com/wPLoPQs.png

pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2017/missed.png
 
Ian Butler
Wow. Those stats are really off, sorry to say Pfft

Vanmarcke was one of the strongest if not the strongest on the cobbles in the race. and why is Stannard 2 COB better than those in the front group? He won because he could sit at the wheel for 40 km, not because he was dominating over the cobbles... Stats could use some work Wink
 
TheManxMissile
But why make this? Why not also include KBK as well? Why not wait for the real classics?
Edited by TheManxMissile on 02-03-2015 14:42
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2023/teamhq-tmm.png

i.imgur.com/yYwvYPG.png
 
Paul23
You only made them with the results...Vanmarcke was the strongest, Stannard had an awesome form, Boonen hadn't(at least it looked like it...)
i.imgur.com/aJSlUNt.png
 
MARSUPILAMI
@Ian Butler What I want is to adjust to reality so, see Stannard winning, Vanmarcke NOT winning (yes, he was the strongest, but he didn´t win, so I can´t put him 85, even maybe he deserves it), Rowe winning Kristoff or Démare the group sprint...

@TMM I don´t know, it could be interesting, not?

@Paul23 See what I said to Ian Butler

@TMM (answering his edition) The startlist of Omloop and KBK isn´t the same... But what I´ll do after all cobbled classics is a DB and startlists for each race.
Edited by MARSUPILAMI on 02-03-2015 14:44
imgur.com/wPLoPQs.png

pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2017/missed.png
 
matt17br
Do you realise that Vanmarcke had a flat tire twice? Rolling Eyes
How can you pretend to be able to make something like that if you clearly haven't watched the race?
Edited by matt17br on 02-03-2015 14:47
(Former) Manager of pcmdaily.com/images/mg/2020/Micros/gen.png Generali pcmdaily.com/images/mg/2020/Micros/gen.png
 
http://v.ht/Matt17
Ad Bot
Posted on 11-12-2025 16:31
Bot Agent

Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09

IP: None  
MARSUPILAMI
I have watched the race, Matt, I know he had two flat tires... but I want reality! And yes, in reality he was the strongest, but in reality he didn´t win...
imgur.com/wPLoPQs.png

pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2017/missed.png
 
Roextro
That is a very bad theory MARS, thats like putting Froome and Contador at 55 MO because they crashed out
 
MARSUPILAMI
Yes, it´s like that.

PS: Don´t you realise you are always f*cking my projects?
imgur.com/wPLoPQs.png

pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2017/missed.png
 
roturn
With PCM you won`t get reality anyway. :lol:

Actually I think rating the performances would be far better than the result as others said.
Just because you might get the exact podium with your way, you won`t get reality (as you want) due to the fact that except for the result nothing else is close to real.

Vanmarcke was unlucky. Might happen to a 83cob Stannard in PCM to make him lose btw.
Then Vanmarcke was pretty much alone against 3 Quickstep riders! Not much he can do there but still giving a huge fight.
Edited by roturn on 02-03-2015 14:54
 
Roextro
MARSUPILAMI wrote:
Yes, it´s like that.

PS: Don´t you realise you are always f*cking my projects?


Not fucking, but providing constructive criticism
 
matt17br
And what's the point of creating a db based on the results then? Also, it's not our fault if your projects are in most cases pointless. The graphic pack is an amazing idea, has anyone complained about it? No! If someone "fucks up" your projects is because your projects are already fucked up themselves!
Edited by matt17br on 02-03-2015 14:56
(Former) Manager of pcmdaily.com/images/mg/2020/Micros/gen.png Generali pcmdaily.com/images/mg/2020/Micros/gen.png
 
http://v.ht/Matt17
MARSUPILAMI
And how many I am thinking to put Vanmarcke in Flat? And of course, I´ll add him a lot of STA, RES and REC, but I won´t put him more than 77/78 COB
imgur.com/wPLoPQs.png

pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2017/missed.png
 
Paul23
matt17br wrote:
And what's the point of creating a db based on the results then? Also, it's not our fault if your projects are in most cases pointless. The graphic pack is an amazing idea, has anyone complained about it? No! If someone "fucks up" your projects is because your projects are already fucked up themselves!


Remember what i wrote in skype Pfft
i.imgur.com/aJSlUNt.png
 
MARSUPILAMI
What did you write? I deserve to know it...
imgur.com/wPLoPQs.png

pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2017/missed.png
 
Paul23
MARSUPILAMI wrote:
What did you write? I deserve to know it...


Ok. I am honest with you. Everyone was praising your work, and I just thought that the shirt makers did much more work...

Its like those 5h dubstep videos...the actual makers of the music made the work and some guy just put them together in one video, but the video maker gets all the credit. I am the opinion, that this is kinda wrong.
i.imgur.com/aJSlUNt.png
 
MARSUPILAMI
Yep, that´s mid-true. It was too such a big work to compilate and rename ALL the files under the same pattern, not?
imgur.com/wPLoPQs.png

pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2017/missed.png
 
matt17br
MARSUPILAMI wrote:
Yep, that´s mid-true. It was too such a big work to compilate and rename ALL the files under the same pattern, not?

You said that advanced renamer made your life much easier :lol:
(Former) Manager of pcmdaily.com/images/mg/2020/Micros/gen.png Generali pcmdaily.com/images/mg/2020/Micros/gen.png
 
http://v.ht/Matt17
Kiserlovski01
matt17br wrote:
MARSUPILAMI wrote:
Yep, that´s mid-true. It was too such a big work to compilate and rename ALL the files under the same pattern, not?

You said that advanced renamer made your life much easier :lol:


Zabel'd :lol:
 
MARSUPILAMI
Yeah, but anyway it was hard... with v1 and v2 there are 329 sponsors... THAT´S A LOT, NO?
imgur.com/wPLoPQs.png

pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2017/missed.png
 
Jump to Forum:
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Latest content
Screenshots
Crash
Crash
PCM10: General Screenshots
Fantasy Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet fighti... 23,876 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 20,945 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 19,674 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 17,752 PCM$
bullet baseba... 13,739 PCM$

bullet Main Fantasy Betting page
bullet Rankings: Top 100
ManGame Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet Ollfardh 24,090 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 20,400 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 17,820 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 17,700 PCM$
bullet Caspi 10,830 PCM$

bullet Main MG Betting page
bullet Get weekly MG PCM$
bullet Rankings: Top 100
Render time: 0.15 seconds