|
7Zip vs WinRar
|
| Johan92 |
Posted on 17-06-2010 18:54
|
Domestique
Posts: 692
Joined: 26-09-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Can I ask why the PCM-scene uses WinRar over 7Zip to compress DBs etc? 7Zip compress to a lot smaler size than WinRar. And that saves everyone for time and bandwidth. 7Zip-files can also be read by WinRar.
www.pcmnorge.no
|
| |
|
|
| andybandy |
Posted on 17-06-2010 22:36
|
Stagiare
Posts: 162
Joined: 10-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
The 1996 DB for PCM10 could have been 55 mb if you had compressed it with 7-zip and ultra settings. That's half the size of the package now. The Correct Jerseys package could have been only 18 mb (!) compared to 68 mb now.
7-Zip is free, open source and can as Johan92 says can be extracted with WinRar. There are only positive sides of you ask me. 
Edited by andybandy on 17-06-2010 22:37
|
| |
|
|
| Ad Bot |
Posted on 05-12-2025 18:58
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
| IP: None |
|
|
| Rauling |
Posted on 17-06-2010 22:53
|
Domestique
Posts: 437
Joined: 09-02-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
And there's no disadvantages if you compress it with the 7Zip?
I mean - is there a chance that the computer will make some mistakes because of the small size? |
| |
|
|
| Johan92 |
Posted on 17-06-2010 22:54
|
Domestique
Posts: 692
Joined: 26-09-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
No. It's the same thing, but compress to a lot smaller size. The PCMNorge 98Db was also compressed with 7Zip, under 75 mb was that package.
www.pcmnorge.no
|
| |
|
|
| MarcoPRT |
Posted on 17-06-2010 22:59
|
Protected Rider
Posts: 1007
Joined: 07-08-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
The general "scene" uses Winrar. I always used Winrar since I needed to compress a file for the first time, and I believe the same happens with lot of people.
|
| |
|
|
| andybandy |
Posted on 17-06-2010 22:59
|
Stagiare
Posts: 162
Joined: 10-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
The compression algorithm in 7-Zip works much better on files that PCM uses much (TGA for instance) than WinRar. I don't know if people here use maximum compression in WinRar, but 7-Zip should be a lot better anyways. After all it's not the filesize of the DB that decides how good it is. |
| |
|
|
| Rauling |
Posted on 17-06-2010 23:03
|
Domestique
Posts: 437
Joined: 09-02-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
Yeah, i'm not the person who upload files in those dimensions but it would be nice if databases like Daily's could be compressed to sizes like that.
Less downloading time |
| |
|
|
| Johan92 |
Posted on 17-06-2010 23:03
|
Domestique
Posts: 692
Joined: 26-09-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Marco: Yes, but 7Zip does exactly the same as WinRar, but compress to a smaller size. Saves everyone for time and bandwidth.
EDIT: As Rauling says, if Daily use 7Zip we could download the DB on half the time.
Edited by Johan92 on 17-06-2010 23:04
www.pcmnorge.no
|
| |
|
|
| CrueTrue |
Posted on 18-06-2010 09:49
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 27880
Joined: 20-10-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
I don't mind using 7Zip in the future.
The reason why I'm using WinRAR is simply that that's the standard program I've used for compression/decompression pretty much ever since I got my first computer (in 1994 - WinRAR was released in 93  ). |
| |
|
