PCM.daily banner
05-12-2025 15:07
PCM.daily
Users Online
· Guests Online: 60

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 54,920
· Newest Member: RodrigueGauthier
View Thread
 Print Thread
The Politics Thread
CrueTrue
I'm a member of SF, so it's natural to vote for them. However, I'm always "watching out" for other parties. They may surprise. Søvndal did do a very good job, though, so it will take a lot from the other parties to make my vote change Wink

You?
 
http://www.pcmdaily.com
niconico
I'm pretty sure I'll vote for Socialdemokratiet, at least I know I'll stay on the socialistic side of the spectrum. I'm pretty new to politics and I'm not a member of any parties like you, so I'll vote for the parties, that exercise the ideology that appeals to me the most, I could end up voting for SF aswell. Smile
i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq112/Gustavovskiy/microjerseys14/bampo.png
 
CrueTrue
Well, you could use this: https://politiken.dk/politik/article36...369438.ece. It asks you 20 questions, you answer them and it will tell you which party you agree with the most Wink
 
http://www.pcmdaily.com
Balaverde
CrueTrue wrote:
I'm a member of SF, so it's natural to vote for them. However, I'm always "watching out" for other parties. They may surprise. Søvndal did do a very good job, though, so it will take a lot from the other parties to make my vote change Wink

You?


I feared that you were liberal, Mike. Glad to meet you at the red side of life Wink

Same goes for you, Andy.
 
niconico
Actually I agreed most with SF by 73% Smile

I was actually a bit shocked that Socialdemokratiet doesn't want to lower the 24-years rule. Shock
i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq112/Gustavovskiy/microjerseys14/bampo.png
 
CrueTrue
A_Schleck wrote:
Actually I agreed most with SF by 73% Smile

I was actually a bit shocked that Socialdemokratiet doesn't want to lower the 24-years rule. Shock


If they said they would remove it, they would lose a lot of their middle voters and also be very vunerable to attacks from the right wing.
And in fact, all parties accept the 24-year-rule, except Enhedslisten. Even Ny Alliance accepts it.
Edited by CrueTrue on 27-10-2007 12:41
 
http://www.pcmdaily.com
niconico
Oh - well I don't think I'll go as far as Enhedslisten Pfft
i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq112/Gustavovskiy/microjerseys14/bampo.png
 
Ad Bot
Posted on 05-12-2025 15:07
Bot Agent

Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09

IP: None  
rodda
The election is happening as i speak here in Australia and Labor has been declared the new government, taking the title from the Liberal party with relative ease, as expected. Probably the main surprise is that the Prime Minister seems likely to lose his own seat in parliament Frown
www.thecoolwebsite.co.uk/images/userbars/moderator.gif
 
www.thecoolwebsite.co.uk
rodda
IFF wrote:
rodda wrote:
The election is happening as i speak here in Australia and Labor has been declared the new government, taking the title from the Liberal party with relative ease, as expected. Probably the main surprise is that the Prime Minister seems likely to lose his own seat in parliament Frown


so howard fails to become a five term prime minister


and that smarmy bastard costello finally gets to lead a party :x

bring back pauline hansen (not) Frown

Edit: looks as though i was totally wrong there, costello has stepped down Shock
Edited by rodda on 27-11-2007 04:53
www.thecoolwebsite.co.uk/images/userbars/moderator.gif
 
www.thecoolwebsite.co.uk
rodda
a tribute to the outgoing john howard


www.thecoolwebsite.co.uk/images/userbars/moderator.gif
 
www.thecoolwebsite.co.uk
CrueTrue
:lol: Doesn't sound like they are going to miss him
 
http://www.pcmdaily.com
Levi4life
Crommy wrote:
In England, any party has a chance of winning - its not like America Wink

Although only 2 parties are ever going to win


There is nothing in the American system that says that we only have a two party system. However the only two parties who ever get elected are the Dems and Republicans. Its been that way since Andrew Jackson. Parties like the Independents and the Green Party do a lot better on the state level.
The electoral system in most states is an all or nothing deal. If the majority of the state votes one way all of the elctoral votes go to that party(there are exceptions) which is why there are elections in which one candidate gets the popular vote and the other wins on electoral votes.
i392.photobucket.com/albums/pp1/Dessel001/CozzaNydamV2.png
 
Crommy
Sorry, I was talking about the UK there - only Labour and Conservative.

Sorry about the America reference, I really should know better
 
rodda
in Australia there is the coalition - liberal + national parties - traditionally conservative.

and the labor party which is traditionally the "working class" party

however at present they are both almost exactly the same as each other - and the same as the American republican party.

there are of course other parties but they will never win, and if they did it would most likely be terrible :lol:
www.thecoolwebsite.co.uk/images/userbars/moderator.gif
 
www.thecoolwebsite.co.uk
Levi4life
Super Tuesday is Upon US! Super tuesday is important because both major American parties hold primaries in 22 states including California. The runners from each party takes with him or her the percentage of each states delegates from to the each parties national convention and at the convention each party picks its nominee for the presidency. What do I think about the Candidates?

The Dems:

Barrack Obama: His promises of change may be the key to his success. His civil service record can only be beaten by one man. Yet will his relative inexperience bring him down.

Billary Clinton: Clinton has the experience And I mean a lot of experience. She has been around FOREVER but didn't have the balls to dump Bill after he gots caughts wit Monica y'all know what I saying mmm hmm.

The Republicans:

Mitt Romney: Isn't really offering anything we haven't heard before.

Ron Paul: This crazy guy is SOOOOO far right that the republicans don't want to claim himPfft. He wants the US to abide strictly to the constitution, AND back up every American Dollar with Gold. What this would mean is no more foreign aide to other countries, no more foreign intervention at all and the dollar would be worth something.

John Mcain: Probably the most likely guy to come out of Super Tuesday with a clear lead in the Republican Primaries. He is a more moderate republican but is still conservative. He beats out obama in his service for his country as he spent years in the Notorious Hanoi Hilton prison camp during the Vietnam war after being shot down.

My Predictions: Obama will come out of Super Tuesday in the lead becasue Billary is just a scary mutherfucker.
McCain will remain the republican front runner cause Ron Paul is too crazy and Mitt Romney is MormanPfft



i392.photobucket.com/albums/pp1/Dessel001/CozzaNydamV2.png
 
rodda
go OSAMA!
www.thecoolwebsite.co.uk/images/userbars/moderator.gif
 
www.thecoolwebsite.co.uk
rodda
go OSAMA!
www.thecoolwebsite.co.uk/images/userbars/moderator.gif
 
www.thecoolwebsite.co.uk
KurtinSC
The Dems will still be up in the air after tonight. All of the states are proporitional, so neither can get a huge lead.

On the Republican side, McCain will likely come out far ahead. He leads in all 7 of the "winner take all states" (including New York, which has a lot of delegates). That combined with keeping close in the proportional states will give him a clear lead.

 
CrueTrue
I usually never comment politics on forums, but anyway: I've been following the American election closely through both American and Danish media, and I've been waiting for this Super Tuesday for a long time. As you guys say, it seems like McCain will take the win for the Republicans. He seems to be a "true" Conservative, which I guess is one of his advantages. I don't really care who wins since I basically disagree in pretty much everything they say.

On the Democratic side, it's a lot more exciting. Hillary vs. Barrack. They agree on a whole lot of stuff, so in fact, it's not important who wins. That being said, I tend to like Hillary Clinton more - why? Because she's more "political". Barrack Obama tends to be some sort of new "Martin Luther King", speaking about dreams and how the world would be if everything was perfect, instead of speaking about how to solve the problems Bush and his government has started. Clinton is more down to earth, in my opinion.

Anyway, that's just my two cents. As long as a Conservative guy doesn't win again, I'm happy. I cried when George Bush was reelected -- yes, I'm serious -- so please, a Democrat! Wink
 
http://www.pcmdaily.com
Crommy
I'm disappointed that all the media over here focuses on is whether the next President is black of a woman, and how huge a step that is - for crying out loud, it's not sex or race, it's the person and their policies that matters.
emoticons4u.com/happy/042.gif
 
Jump to Forum:
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Latest content
Screenshots
Astana in the pack
Astana in the pack
PCM09: Official Screenshots
Fantasy Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet fighti... 23,776 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 20,845 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 19,674 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 17,752 PCM$
bullet baseba... 13,639 PCM$

bullet Main Fantasy Betting page
bullet Rankings: Top 100
ManGame Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet Ollfardh 24,090 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 20,300 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 17,820 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 17,700 PCM$
bullet Caspi 10,730 PCM$

bullet Main MG Betting page
bullet Get weekly MG PCM$
bullet Rankings: Top 100
Render time: 0.17 seconds