|
CrueTrue wrote:
Yes, I did realise that, but I don't think that anyone is doubting that the CQRanking is a much better ranking to judge the strength of the teams.
So, I stand by what I said: Tinkoff has been doing much better ths season than Katusha has.
I'm sorry did I question your statement that Tinkoff has been doing much better this season than Katusha has? I thought I only underlined that.
My only remark was that it seemed that you misunderstood Maximka.
He was just pointing out that Katusha finished higher in the rankings of the UCI Europe tour then Tinkoff in an attempt to underline his point (which is that he thinks Katusha should be have been in the database). In fact your comment only helps his point. You said Katusha is 63th in the CQ rankings, while there are almost 100 teams in the database (correct me if I'm wrong). |
