baseballlover312 wrote:
Why does Lance have a 75 on Mtns??? He should have much more than that, like 78 or 79. And you cannot say it's because he is old, cause Horner is a better climber in your db. And in 2010 Lance did bad cause he crashed.
Sorry, I'm being rude and obnoxious.
Good luck anyway...
Its because he's old...
This is a story, if your are unhappy with Lance's stats make your own "fantasy" story about Lance
baseballlover312 wrote:
Why does Lance have a 75 on Mtns??? He should have much more than that, like 78 or 79. And you cannot say it's because he is old, cause Horner is a better climber in your db. And in 2010 Lance did bad cause he crashed.
Sorry, I'm being rude and obnoxious.
Good luck anyway...
Its because he's old...
This is a story, if your are unhappy with Lance's stats make your own "fantasy" story about Lance
Great Idea. I will then.
I know I sound rude in the post but Horner is old and he has a 77, so I was just wondering why a man very close in age to him, who won 7 TDF's, has a 75.
RIP Exxon Duke, David Veilleux, Double Feature, and Monster Energy
baseballlover312 wrote:
Why does Lance have a 75 on Mtns??? He should have much more than that, like 78 or 79. And you cannot say it's because he is old, cause Horner is a better climber in your db. And in 2010 Lance did bad cause he crashed.
Sorry, I'm being rude and obnoxious.
Good luck anyway...
Its because he's old...
This is a story, if your are unhappy with Lance's stats make your own "fantasy" story about Lance
Great Idea. I will then.
I know I sound rude in the post but Horner is old and he has a 77, so I was just wondering why a man very close in age to him, who won 7 TDF's, has a 75.
Different growth patterns you wouldnt give someone who wins the tour at 20 to 27 but then is 40th(at best) when 30 82 because he is younger then horner because growth ptterns are all different
baseballlover312 wrote:
Why does Lance have a 75 on Mtns??? He should have much more than that, like 78 or 79. And you cannot say it's because he is old, cause Horner is a better climber in your db. And in 2010 Lance did bad cause he crashed.
Sorry, I'm being rude and obnoxious.
Good luck anyway...
Its because he's old...
This is a story, if your are unhappy with Lance's stats make your own "fantasy" story about Lance
Great Idea. I will then.
I know I sound rude in the post but Horner is old and he has a 77, so I was just wondering why a man very close in age to him, who won 7 TDF's, has a 75.
Different growth patterns you wouldnt give someone who wins the tour at 20 to 27 but then is 40th(at best) when 30 82 because he is younger then horner because growth ptterns are all different
Barely understould a word you said(periods work wonders). Lance won the tour at 27-34. And finished third at 38.
RIP Exxon Duke, David Veilleux, Double Feature, and Monster Energy
baseballlover312 wrote:
Why does Lance have a 75 on Mtns??? He should have much more than that, like 78 or 79. And you cannot say it's because he is old, cause Horner is a better climber in your db. And in 2010 Lance did bad cause he crashed.
Sorry, I'm being rude and obnoxious.
Good luck anyway...
Its because he's old...
PoThis is a story, if your are unhappy with Lance's stats make your own "fantasy" story about Lance
Great Idea. I will then.
I know I sound rude in the post but Horner is old and he has a 77, so I was just wondering why a man very close in age to him, who won 7 TDF's, has a 75.
Different growth patterns you wouldnt give someone who wins the tour at 20 to 27 but then is 40th(at best) when 30 82 because he is younger then horner because growth ptterns are all different
Barely understould a word you said(periods work wonders). Lance won the tour at 27-34. And finished third at 38.
