PCM.daily banner
05-12-2025 17:14
PCM.daily
Users Online
· Guests Online: 45

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 54,920
· Newest Member: RodrigueGauthier
View Thread
PCM.daily » PCM.daily's Management Game » [Man-Game] The Rules and Announcements
 Print Thread
Updated Database
wackojackohighcliffe
Aren't we all helpful Pfft
 
Heine
Haha, noone can say that we are slow to help :-p
 
CrueTrue
I'm proud of this forum Wink
 
http://www.pcmdaily.com
untal
Wow, thanks guys! Smile
 
Kami
SotD weote:
I don't see the problem in mentioning talents either. The DB is there for anyone. No need to list up the domestique riders, who could be good value for 50-70.000 but the talents who could be leading riders of tomorrow are already printed on the mind of 80% of the managers I would say... No need to hide those. They will reach the required wages no matter what.


Well, there you have it.

1. They will already reach their required wage.
2. 80% of the managers.

They will be expensive enough like they are now. The remaining 20% of managers who didn't find them are mostly new managers probably. Those new managers 2.500.000 and adding a note like 'Future Giro winner' will make his price go up even more.

Point being, SN could easily add a collumn to the DB so you can sort the new riders out. But he doesn't. There are always going to be riders overlooked. Last year, a future 77 AVG was a free agent.
Manager of:
Bacardi Limited


pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2010/09_Newmember.png
 
rjc_43
SN does add a column called New riders, but he deletes it pre-release so that people get excited about finding new talents themselves without others shouting out about them.

If only two guys had found someone with say, 77 potential in hill, and one shouted out about it, but had no desire to buy him himself, then it ruins the transfers a bit for the other guy who was going to buy him, cheaply.

I frown down upon pointing out potential stats of riders, new and old, in public, as it has been said, it increases their value, whilst making people lazy in searching. The stat file has been added, which lets everyone put in the work to find good riders, so no one has any excuse.

SN doesn't appear to have yet said this, so this is important to anyone looking to buy future talents:

There has been a change to stat increases.

It has been said. Let no man say otherwise.

Instead of another Madrazo situation (which I, personally, had no problem with), where a rider goes from level 3 to maximum in a season, there has been a limit placed on amount of increases in experience that can be undergone in one season.

There is NO limit going from 1.00 to 3.99.
You cannot go from 2.00 to 4.00+ in one season.
You can go from 2.00 to 3.99 in a season.
You cannot go from 3.00 to 4.100 in one season.
You can go from 3.00 to 4.99 in a season.

In other words, you can get a talent from 1.00 up two levels, but you can't get a level 2.00 up two levels. Or a 3.00 to maximum in a season. This is to prevent an unrealistic mad increase in stats of a rider.

If you don't understand, please ask, and I'd be happy to explain in my mumbled jumbled words. Or give examples.


Also another announcement, that is particularly in reference to one of my teams: Focused Cycling. As I quite like developing riders that are overlooked, I have agreed with SN that I will be given the updated DB at the end of the transfers, and will be allowed to take on a number of young/old riders whom I want to, that have been overlooked. That means that Focused Cycling, come the end of public transfers, will end with less than 20 riders (8 planned riders), and will then take on the rest in guys no one appears to want. No one should have an issue with this, as you'll have had the two weeks of transfers to find guys you want, and the few days now. I just want to announce it, so no one can complain.

And thus ends my waffling, mindless announcements. Enjoy the DB searching one and all!
[url=cleavercycling.co.uk]imageprocessor.websimages.com/width/420/www.cleavercycling.co.uk/CleaverCyclingWebHeader.png[/url]
 
http://cleavercycling.co.uk
Ad Bot
Posted on 05-12-2025 17:14
Bot Agent

Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09

IP: None  
Heine
I like the changes to experience gathering, much more realistic in my opinion. SO if I get this right, you will need a minimum of 3 years to get a rider to the highest level Grin

About Focused Cycling, sounds like a good idea, are there any chanse that they might sell one of their riders... Like Klemme (A)
 
rjc_43
Heine: experience gathering is spot on. 3 years minimum.

Focused doesn't have Klemme... I do have Mehr-Wenige! Who is more awesome.
[url=cleavercycling.co.uk]imageprocessor.websimages.com/width/420/www.cleavercycling.co.uk/CleaverCyclingWebHeader.png[/url]
 
http://cleavercycling.co.uk
valverde321
If only two guys had found someone with say, 77 potential in hill, and one shouted out about it, but had no desire to buy him himself, then it ruins the transfers a bit for the other guy who was going to buy him, cheaply.


This.


Also when I rider goes from say EXP level 1 to 2 he gets an automatic stat increase, or does it only increasse once the season is over?
 
Heine
I wrote wrong, I meant Mehr-Wenige :-p Sell to meeee!

valverde: Once season is over
 
viking90
Many good Swedish riders are free agents, I like that. (y)
Looking forward to the transfer season!

Amazing job SportingNonsense!
 
Gustavovskiy
That's a really good effort SN, Congratulations, and thanks a lot for this wonder

And by the look of some comments, I think I'm going to leave some people disapointed in the transfer season. On the other hand, I'm sure there will be lots of oportunities for paybacks so, in the end, we'll all have a lot of...

Spoiler
files.sharenator.com/FUN_FUN_FUN_FUN_Just_dumping_all_my_friday_girl_pics_in_one_single_load-s360x360-147420.jpg

Manager of pcmdaily.com/images/mg/2025/Micros/eve.png Everesting pcmdaily.com/images/mg/2025/Micros/eve.png
 
Levi4life
Valverde, all of the stat increases happen after the season has concluded
i392.photobucket.com/albums/pp1/Dessel001/CozzaNydamV2.png
 
rjc_43
valverde321 wrote:
If only two guys had found someone with say, 77 potential in hill, and one shouted out about it, but had no desire to buy him himself, then it ruins the transfers a bit for the other guy who was going to buy him, cheaply.


This.



I'm just saying that, although there is no rule against it, informing people about talents (as has already happened here) is quite annoying to those of us who want to bid on those talents. It means that other guys who haven't bothered to check the DB get an insight into who is actually good. And that means that more guys will bid on specific riders, which increases the cost of them.

Telling a person about a riders potential stats to ensure they do bid on a rider, in an attempt to increase that riders value, when the person you tell previously had no inclination to bid on the rider will also result in punishment.
[url=cleavercycling.co.uk]imageprocessor.websimages.com/width/420/www.cleavercycling.co.uk/CleaverCyclingWebHeader.png[/url]
 
http://cleavercycling.co.uk
Rin
I am happy with the new talents/riders, the countries I would like to have in my team (superior number, not just these countries) have also good talents but I doubt I will get one of them Sad
i1215.photobucket.com/albums/cc512/ANFreeman/Jersey%20Sprites/bianchi.pngTeam Bianchi - 2012 Man-Game ProContinental Tour Championsi1215.photobucket.com/albums/cc512/ANFreeman/Jersey%20Sprites/bianchi.png
www.pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2013/Admin.png
 
rjc_43
Heine wrote:
I wrote wrong, I meant Mehr-Wenige :-p Sell to meeee!


That's the first enquiry for one of my riders, based on my team's philosophy of trying to get riders who are ignored a place on a good team, you should probably send me an offer during the transfer season. I will listen to all, and once I chose an offer, I stick with it.
[url=cleavercycling.co.uk]imageprocessor.websimages.com/width/420/www.cleavercycling.co.uk/CleaverCyclingWebHeader.png[/url]
 
http://cleavercycling.co.uk
mb2612
I will listen to all, and once I chose an offer, I stick with it.


This I find much more annoying than anything else in the transfer season, when teams agree deals in secret then refuse to change when other teams come along.



i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq112/Gustavovskiy/microjerseys/PT/std_zpsb6c2f350.png[url=www.pcmdaily.com/forum/viewthread.php?thread_id=33182]Team Santander Media Thread[/url]i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq112/Gustavovskiy/microjerseys/PT/std_zpsb6c2f350.png

Please assume I am joking unless otherwise stated
 
dave92
to me, its up to the manager. If i negotiate a swap with someone via pm its nice to know we wont have the deal break down because someone else swoops in. People who are being bid on in threads are one thing but pm deals are different to me.
Manager of Wikipedia, 2008 Continental Tour Champions
Team Page: https://pcmdaily.com/forum/viewthread....ad_id=3992
Media: https://pcmdaily.com/forum/viewthread....ad_id=3791
 
rjc_43
mb2612 wrote:
I will listen to all, and once I chose an offer, I stick with it.


This I find much more annoying than anything else in the transfer season, when teams agree deals in secret then refuse to change when other teams come along.




What is more annoying to me is agreeing something in public, to then have the other manager switch deals at the drop of a hat. At least I am not two faced, and stick to my guns. Usually if someone else comes along after a deal has been posted, it's because they don't really have a clue who they wanted to target, and are just going for whomever pops up. I prefer someone who has a plan. At the end of the day, it's all up to the manager as dave said. Just like it's up to me not to deal with certain managers, and to prefer others.
[url=cleavercycling.co.uk]imageprocessor.websimages.com/width/420/www.cleavercycling.co.uk/CleaverCyclingWebHeader.png[/url]
 
http://cleavercycling.co.uk
fenian_1234
If I agree a deal via PM, I'll usually try and stick to it. However, if someone comes in with a much better offer once it's posted, then I think it's common sense to consider it.

Think I always try to put in Win-Win offers when getting riders, so that when it does go public it's hard for someone to better the offer.
 
Jump to Forum:
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Latest content
Screenshots
Stats, sorted by best sprinter
Stats, sorted by best sprinter
PCM 07: General Screenshots
Fantasy Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet fighti... 23,776 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 20,845 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 19,674 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 17,752 PCM$
bullet baseba... 13,639 PCM$

bullet Main Fantasy Betting page
bullet Rankings: Top 100
ManGame Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet Ollfardh 24,090 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 20,300 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 17,820 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 17,700 PCM$
bullet Caspi 10,730 PCM$

bullet Main MG Betting page
bullet Get weekly MG PCM$
bullet Rankings: Top 100
Render time: 0.50 seconds