PCM.daily banner
19-12-2025 12:23
PCM.daily
Users Online
· Guests Online: 62

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 54,920
· Newest Member: RodrigueGauthier
View Thread
PCM.daily » Off-Topic » Cycling
 Print Thread
Tour de France, Stage 9 - Monday, July 9th Arc-et-Senans - Besançon
TheManxMissile
baseballlover312 wrote:
TheManxMissile wrote:
This is insane!
I still believe sky is clean though, because there is no evidence to the contrary (riding well does not equal evidence).

Beating Cancellara by almost 30 seconds at first time check after never having a good result before the Vuelta = evidence


No it equals good preperation and a strong ride
Evidence is a failed test, missed test etc. something scientific that can be proven and backed up in a case for CAS
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2023/teamhq-tmm.png

i.imgur.com/yYwvYPG.png
 
doddy13
baseballlover312 wrote:
TheManxMissile wrote:
This is insane!
I still believe sky is clean though, because there is no evidence to the contrary (riding well does not equal evidence).

Beating Cancellara by almost 30 seconds at first time check after never having a good result before the Vuelta = evidence


ahh yes. He's doing abnormally well when discount all evidence that say it could be natural.
There's no point slapping a schleck - Sean Kelly on "Who needs a slap"
 
madzdaman
if sky are doped, then what about van garderen? he was nearly as fast as the four time world champion and 1m 10seconds ahead of the current world champion.doped much? this is before we talk about velits, kloden and chavanel....if we're gonna call a surprise doping then call EVERY good/great/unexpected result doping
 
fcancellara
Wiggins, okay.

But Froome?

He never really did anything good until last years Vuelta, where he suddenly finished second, and now he is crushing the time of the strongest time triallist in the world?

I have a feeling Sky, or at least Froome, is not clean...
Edited by fcancellara on 09-07-2012 16:10
i1293.photobucket.com/albums/b593/caspervdl2/PCM/PCM13/Headers/graphicartistoftheyear12_zpse6637662.png

i1293.photobucket.com/albums/b593/caspervdl2/PCM/PCM13/Headers/musicbanner_zps3d73b387.png
 
www.twitter.com/caspervdluijt
TheManxMissile
madzdaman wrote:
if sky are doped, then what about van garderen? he was nearly as fast as the four time world champion and 1m 10seconds ahead of the current world champion.doped much? this is before we talk about velits, kloden and chavanel....if we're gonna call a surprise doping then call EVERY good/great/unexpected result doping


Can i extend this to Boonen winning all 4 cobbled classics or Iglinksy winning LBL?
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2023/teamhq-tmm.png

i.imgur.com/yYwvYPG.png
 
Smal
baseballlover312 wrote:
TheManxMissile wrote:
This is insane!
I still believe sky is clean though, because there is no evidence to the contrary (riding well does not equal evidence).

Beating Cancellara by almost 30 seconds at first time check after never having a good result before the Vuelta = evidence


Is TJVG doping as well then? He'd normally be well off Cancellara's time.

This course is built to go over the first part fastest. Looks to me like Sky have realised that and gone over the first part a lot faster than others. It's not as if Froome's pulled out more time at the second checkpoint.
 
ianrussell
Good ride for Roche and top 10 goal.
 
Ad Bot
Posted on 19-12-2025 12:23
Bot Agent

Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09

IP: None  
gotlandrules
madzdaman wrote:
if sky are doped, then what about van garderen? he was nearly as fast as the four time world champion and 1m 10seconds ahead of the current world champion.doped much? this is before we talk about velits, kloden and chavanel....if we're gonna call a surprise doping then call EVERY good/great/unexpected result doping


Only difference is that they are not crushing everyone else uphill and that they actually have results in TTs over many years. Otherwise ur spot on!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

(and i'm not saying they don't dope, just that your argument was really retarded.)
Edited by gotlandrules on 09-07-2012 16:13
 
CountArach
Really good effort from VDB the.
i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq112/Gustavovskiy/microjerseys/PCT/bps_zps2b426596.png Manager of Team Bpost - Vlaanderen i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq112/Gustavovskiy/microjerseys/PCT/bps_zps2b426596.png

Follow me on Twitter
(All opinions expressed are not guaranteed to reflect reality)
 
SportingNonsense
ianrussell wrote:
Good ride for Roche and top 10 goal.


Yep, probably one of his best TTs in his career
farm8.staticflickr.com/7458/9357923136_f1e68270f3_n.jpg
 
CLURPR
gotlandrules wrote:
madzdaman wrote:
if sky are doped, then what about van garderen? he was nearly as fast as the four time world champion and 1m 10seconds ahead of the current world champion.doped much? this is before we talk about velits, kloden and chavanel....if we're gonna call a surprise doping then call EVERY good/great/unexpected result doping


Only difference is that they are not crushing everyone else uphill and that they actually have results in TTs over many years. Otherwise ur spot on!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Well Wiggins does have results over the years...
 
Likkivi
doddy13 wrote:
baseballlover312 wrote:
TheManxMissile wrote:
This is insane!
I still believe sky is clean though, because there is no evidence to the contrary (riding well does not equal evidence).

Beating Cancellara by almost 30 seconds at first time check after never having a good result before the Vuelta = evidence


ahh yes. He's doing abnormally well when discount all evidence that say it could be natural.


Tejay Van Garderen is a TT specialist. Froome is not. He is just doped. He has never shown any talent even after being professional for so many years.

Enter's Sky and suddenly he is the best in the world at TT's. Disgusting. This team will do anything to win the tour. I will be so full of joy when they get banned.
 
Pellizotti2
If that provisional GC is correct, then the Tour is over already.
i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq112/Gustavovskiy/microjerseys14/kzi.png Manager of Kazzinc Procycling i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq112/Gustavovskiy/microjerseys14/kzi.png

pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2012/storywriter.png

pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2012/stagemaker.png
 
doddy13
gotlandrules wrote:
madzdaman wrote:
if sky are doped, then what about van garderen? he was nearly as fast as the four time world champion and 1m 10seconds ahead of the current world champion.doped much? this is before we talk about velits, kloden and chavanel....if we're gonna call a surprise doping then call EVERY good/great/unexpected result doping


Only difference is that they are not crushing everyone else uphill and that they actually have results in TTs over many years. Otherwise ur spot on!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

(and i'm not saying they don't dope, just that your argument was really retarded.)


Cause Wiggins doesn't.
There's no point slapping a schleck - Sean Kelly on "Who needs a slap"
 
madzdaman
TheManxMissile wrote:
madzdaman wrote:
if sky are doped, then what about van garderen? he was nearly as fast as the four time world champion and 1m 10seconds ahead of the current world champion.doped much? this is before we talk about velits, kloden and chavanel....if we're gonna call a surprise doping then call EVERY good/great/unexpected result doping


Can i extend this to Boonen winning all 4 cobbled classics or Iglinksy winning LBL?


of course! and schleck is suspicious going on these rules. apart from the tour and LBL 2009, he has put in ONE Good race result.EVER.
 
Kami
doddy13 wrote:
ahh yes. He's doing abnormally well when discount all evidence that say it could be natural.


Tbh, he hasn't really delivered any noticeable results in TT's before last year. Atleast not on this level.
Manager of:
Bacardi Limited


pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2010/09_Newmember.png
 
johannes-w
pretty good ride by VDBSmile
 
cactus-jack
By the way, do you thing Cancellara will leave the tour after today?
There's a fine line between "psychotherapist" and "psycho the rapist"

www.pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2013/funniest.png
pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2013/avatar.png
 
gotlandrules
CLURPR wrote:
gotlandrules wrote:
madzdaman wrote:
if sky are doped, then what about van garderen? he was nearly as fast as the four time world champion and 1m 10seconds ahead of the current world champion.doped much? this is before we talk about velits, kloden and chavanel....if we're gonna call a surprise doping then call EVERY good/great/unexpected result doping


Only difference is that they are not crushing everyone else uphill and that they actually have results in TTs over many years. Otherwise ur spot on!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Well Wiggins does have results over the years...


And i never said he didn't have results in TTs earlier
 
TheManxMissile
Likkivi wrote:
doddy13 wrote:
baseballlover312 wrote:
TheManxMissile wrote:
This is insane!
I still believe sky is clean though, because there is no evidence to the contrary (riding well does not equal evidence).

Beating Cancellara by almost 30 seconds at first time check after never having a good result before the Vuelta = evidence


ahh yes. He's doing abnormally well when discount all evidence that say it could be natural.


Tejay Van Garderen is a TT specialist. Froome is not. He is just doped. He has never shown any talent even after being professional for so many years.

Enter's Sky and suddenly he is the best in the world at TT's. Disgusting. This team will do anything to win the tour. I will be so full of joy when they get banned.


Theyll do so much as to bring a sprinter with a support rider, and then work for him burning energy.
And having solely focused on winning this race to the extent that all riders are in top form, and going for it 200%
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2023/teamhq-tmm.png

i.imgur.com/yYwvYPG.png
 
Jump to Forum:
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Latest content
Screenshots
River Side 2
River Side 2
PCM10: General Screenshots
Fantasy Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet fighti... 23,976 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 21,045 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 19,674 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 17,852 PCM$
bullet baseba... 13,839 PCM$

bullet Main Fantasy Betting page
bullet Rankings: Top 100
ManGame Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet Ollfardh 24,090 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 20,500 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 17,820 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 17,800 PCM$
bullet Caspi 10,930 PCM$

bullet Main MG Betting page
bullet Get weekly MG PCM$
bullet Rankings: Top 100
Render time: 0.15 seconds